+
Highway contractors demand infra loan provisions fixed at 2%
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

Highway contractors demand infra loan provisions fixed at 2%

Instead of the 5% that the Reserve Bank of India had proposed, highway construction contractors proposed fixing the provision that lenders must make against funding their projects at 2%. They said that this would negatively impact the viability of the projects. Lenders are currently required to reserve 0.4% of loans made for highway construction. The new draft rules on infrastructure funding by the banking regulator propose a significant rise in this.

Additionally, the contractors have urged that the government consider 90% of the available land for financial closure rather than the 50% that was originally indicated and that the repayment moratorium be extended from the six months that the RBI had advised to a year.

The National Highways Builders Federation (NHBF) stated in its submission to the National Highways Authority of India, the finance ministry, and the Reserve Bank of India that increasing the provisioning from 0.4% to 5% would pose the greatest challenge to project viability. They explained that this increase in provisioning would lead to higher interest costs, subsequently raising the overall project expenses for both investors and the government.

Additionally, the federation mentioned that they believed implementing a 2% provisioning could be accomplished more swiftly by 2025?26, as opposed to waiting until 2026?27 for the phased implementation of 5% proposed by the RBI.

Regarding the availability of land for the financial closure of infrastructure projects, the NHBF suggested that a land availability of no less than 90% should be deemed sufficient. They emphasised that land availability presents the most significant risk factor, often causing delays or even project terminations.

Furthermore, advocating for an extension of the moratorium period to one year, the NHBF argued that this period is frequently utilised by borrowers to meet initial cash flow needs for stabilising operations. They cautioned that restrictions on this period could strain the company's cash flow and potentially stress the project, especially concerning build-operate-transfer projects.

Instead of the 5% that the Reserve Bank of India had proposed, highway construction contractors proposed fixing the provision that lenders must make against funding their projects at 2%. They said that this would negatively impact the viability of the projects. Lenders are currently required to reserve 0.4% of loans made for highway construction. The new draft rules on infrastructure funding by the banking regulator propose a significant rise in this. Additionally, the contractors have urged that the government consider 90% of the available land for financial closure rather than the 50% that was originally indicated and that the repayment moratorium be extended from the six months that the RBI had advised to a year. The National Highways Builders Federation (NHBF) stated in its submission to the National Highways Authority of India, the finance ministry, and the Reserve Bank of India that increasing the provisioning from 0.4% to 5% would pose the greatest challenge to project viability. They explained that this increase in provisioning would lead to higher interest costs, subsequently raising the overall project expenses for both investors and the government. Additionally, the federation mentioned that they believed implementing a 2% provisioning could be accomplished more swiftly by 2025?26, as opposed to waiting until 2026?27 for the phased implementation of 5% proposed by the RBI. Regarding the availability of land for the financial closure of infrastructure projects, the NHBF suggested that a land availability of no less than 90% should be deemed sufficient. They emphasised that land availability presents the most significant risk factor, often causing delays or even project terminations. Furthermore, advocating for an extension of the moratorium period to one year, the NHBF argued that this period is frequently utilised by borrowers to meet initial cash flow needs for stabilising operations. They cautioned that restrictions on this period could strain the company's cash flow and potentially stress the project, especially concerning build-operate-transfer projects.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Gentari and Shell team up to boost EV charging network in India

Gentari Green Mobility India and Shell India have entered into a strategic roaming partnership aimed at improving electric vehicle (EV) charging accessibility across the country. Starting from 10 July, users of the Gentari Go app will be able to access Shell Recharge charging stations, while Shell Recharge users will also gain access to Gentari’s charging network, covering over 450 chargers.This collaboration is designed to expand the EV charging infrastructure and improve service quality in India by enabling interoperability between the two platforms. Gentari Go already operates more than 3..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Maharashtra may allow higher FSI in Mumbai airport funnel zone

The Maharashtra government is considering the possibility of allowing higher potential Floor Space Index (FSI) for buildings located within Mumbai's airport funnel zone, in response to the redevelopment challenges caused by stringent height restrictions in these areas.The affected regions mainly include Vile Parle, Santacruz, and Kurla. As part of its revised policy for the funnel zone, the state government is, for the first time, offering Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) specifically for redevelopment purposes rather than for land acquisition.The issue was highlighted in the Assembly, whe..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Adani Ports, Airports May Raise $250 Mn from MUFG Amid US Scrutiny

Two entities under the Adani Group are in advanced negotiations to secure around $250 million in offshore bilateral loans from Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), according to a Bloomberg report citing sources familiar with the matter.Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone is expected to raise approximately $100 million, while Adani Airport Holdings aims to secure about $150 million. The agreement related to the ports business could be finalised as early as this week. In addition to MUFG, both companies are also reportedly exploring funding options with other Japanese banks.This marks MUFGâ€..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?