Delhi HC Summons SpiceJet MD Ajay Singh in dispute over Arbitral Award
ECONOMY & POLICY

Delhi HC Summons SpiceJet MD Ajay Singh in dispute over Arbitral Award

The Delhi High Court has summoned Ajay Singh, the Managing Director of the budget airline SpiceJet, to appear before it in January. This pertains to a dispute over interest due on an arbitral award exceeding Rs 5.7 billion, which was ruled in favour of media magnate Kalanithi Maran. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri issued the order on Monday, instructing Ajay Singh to be present at the next hearing scheduled for January 10 next year.

Ajay Singh had previously appeared before the high court on August 24.

During the proceedings, senior advocate Maninder Singh, representing Maran's Kal Airways, informed the high court that SpiceJet and its MD are obligated to pay approximately Rs 4.40 crore to the decree holder (Kal Airways).

However, counsel for SpiceJet disputed this figure, asserting that the remaining balance dues amounted to Rs 1.94 billion. The judgment debtors' appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is pending consideration.

Senior advocate Amit Sibal, representing SpiceJet and its MD, disclosed that the judgment debtors proposed to issue new equity shares in SpiceJet, equivalent to the amount owed to the decree holder, as a means of fulfilling their liability under the arbitral award.

Nonetheless, counsel for Kal Airways rejected this offer, contending that it was unacceptable. They argued that the judgment debtor had not demonstrated bona fides in discharging the remaining liability under the award.

The high court was addressing an enforcement petition filed by Maran and Kal Airways, seeking enforcement of the arbitral award rendered in their favour. On July 31, a single judge upheld the award announced by the arbitral tribunal on July 20, 2018.

The case originated in January 2015 when Singh, the previous owner of the grounded airline, repurchased it from Maran after months of inactivity due to financial constraints. The tribunal ordered Maran to pay Singh and the airline Rs 290 million in penal interest, while Singh was instructed to refund Rs 5.79 billion plus interest to Maran.

The tribunal, established in 2016 by the Delhi High Court to settle a share transfer dispute, concluded that there was no breach of the share sale and purchase agreement between Maran and the current promoter Singh. Singh had approached the single judge bench of the high court to challenge the arbitral award.

Maran, the founder of the Sun Network, and Kal Airways had transferred their 58.46% stake in SpiceJet to Singh in February 2015 for Rs 2, along with Rs 15 billion debt liability. Despite the relief to Singh from Maran's appeal for damages, the case has been ongoing, with Maran alleging that SpiceJet did not fulfill its obligations under the agreement.

Redefine the future of urban mobility! Join us at the Metro Rail Conference 2025 to explore groundbreaking ideas and insights. 👉 Register today!

The Delhi High Court has summoned Ajay Singh, the Managing Director of the budget airline SpiceJet, to appear before it in January. This pertains to a dispute over interest due on an arbitral award exceeding Rs 5.7 billion, which was ruled in favour of media magnate Kalanithi Maran. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri issued the order on Monday, instructing Ajay Singh to be present at the next hearing scheduled for January 10 next year. Ajay Singh had previously appeared before the high court on August 24. During the proceedings, senior advocate Maninder Singh, representing Maran's Kal Airways, informed the high court that SpiceJet and its MD are obligated to pay approximately Rs 4.40 crore to the decree holder (Kal Airways). However, counsel for SpiceJet disputed this figure, asserting that the remaining balance dues amounted to Rs 1.94 billion. The judgment debtors' appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is pending consideration. Senior advocate Amit Sibal, representing SpiceJet and its MD, disclosed that the judgment debtors proposed to issue new equity shares in SpiceJet, equivalent to the amount owed to the decree holder, as a means of fulfilling their liability under the arbitral award. Nonetheless, counsel for Kal Airways rejected this offer, contending that it was unacceptable. They argued that the judgment debtor had not demonstrated bona fides in discharging the remaining liability under the award. The high court was addressing an enforcement petition filed by Maran and Kal Airways, seeking enforcement of the arbitral award rendered in their favour. On July 31, a single judge upheld the award announced by the arbitral tribunal on July 20, 2018. The case originated in January 2015 when Singh, the previous owner of the grounded airline, repurchased it from Maran after months of inactivity due to financial constraints. The tribunal ordered Maran to pay Singh and the airline Rs 290 million in penal interest, while Singh was instructed to refund Rs 5.79 billion plus interest to Maran. The tribunal, established in 2016 by the Delhi High Court to settle a share transfer dispute, concluded that there was no breach of the share sale and purchase agreement between Maran and the current promoter Singh. Singh had approached the single judge bench of the high court to challenge the arbitral award. Maran, the founder of the Sun Network, and Kal Airways had transferred their 58.46% stake in SpiceJet to Singh in February 2015 for Rs 2, along with Rs 15 billion debt liability. Despite the relief to Singh from Maran's appeal for damages, the case has been ongoing, with Maran alleging that SpiceJet did not fulfill its obligations under the agreement.

Next Story
Real Estate

Gujarat Struggles to Curb Illegal Constructions in Ahmedabad

The Gujarat Regulation of Unauthorised Development Act, 2022, presents a contradiction. While it ostensibly seeks to curb unauthorised development, it simultaneously legalises such constructions upon payment of a fee. Despite being introduced initially in the early 2000s, then again in 2011, and most recently enacted in 2022, the legislation has failed to halt the rise of illegal constructions or unapproved extensions to residential and commercial properties. The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation's (AMC) practice of demolishing certain structures while regularising others for a fee has weakened..

Next Story
Real Estate

DTCP Issues Notices for Building Code Violations in Gurugram's DLF

Following a recent survey that identified illegal construction and unauthorized commercial activities at 4,183 properties in DLF Phases 1 to 5, the Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) informed the Punjab and Haryana High Court about the issuance of notices to property owners. DTCP indicated that 1,138 notices had already been served to homeowners in DLF Phase 3, with additional notices to be issued soon. Property owners have until January 31 to revert to the approved building designs and cease all illegal commercial operations. Failure to comply would result in demolition and seali..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Gujarat HC Removes GST on Industrial Leases to Encourage Investment

The recent ruling is set to streamline transactions and potentially encourage increased investments in India’s industrial and commercial leasing sectors. The judgment addressed whether transferring leasehold rights for Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) plots constitutes a ‘supply’ under the GST Act. The court determined that these transactions involve the transfer of immovable property rather than a service, thereby placing them outside the purview of GST. This decision offers significant relief to industries such as manufacturing, logistics, and warehousing, where long..

Hi There!

"Now get regular updates from CW Magazine on WhatsApp!

Join the CW WhatsApp channel for the latest news, industry events, expert insights, and project updates from the construction and infrastructure industry.

Click the link below to join"

+91 81086 03000