Delhi Court denies cancellation of LOC of ATS Infrastructure promoter
ECONOMY & POLICY

Delhi Court denies cancellation of LOC of ATS Infrastructure promoter

A Delhi court has declined to cancel the lookout circular (LOC) issued against ATS Infrastructure Limited’s promoter, Geetamber Anand, and his wife, Poonam Anand. The LOC is tied to multiple FIRs, including those filed by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police for allegedly defrauding homebuyers, and a money laundering case initiated by the Enforcement Directorate.

Judicial Magistrate Yashdeep Chahal, in an order dated September 13, acknowledged that the accused had cooperated with the investigation but emphasized that the LOC serves as a precautionary measure to ensure the judicial process is not undermined.

The judge noted that requiring court permission for overseas travel would not guarantee compliance, as the accused could travel without such authorisation, leaving the court without any practical means to enforce the restriction.

"While personal liberty is important, reasonable restrictions can be imposed on the right to life and liberty under due legal procedures," the judge stated, concluding that there was insufficient reason to revoke the LOC.

However, the judge stressed that authorities must inform individuals of the reasons for preventing their travel. "It is the fundamental right of the accused to be aware of why their travel is being restricted," he remarked.

Advocate Sanjay Abbot represented the homebuyers who lodged complaints against ATS Infrastructure. (ET)

A Delhi court has declined to cancel the lookout circular (LOC) issued against ATS Infrastructure Limited’s promoter, Geetamber Anand, and his wife, Poonam Anand. The LOC is tied to multiple FIRs, including those filed by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Police for allegedly defrauding homebuyers, and a money laundering case initiated by the Enforcement Directorate. Judicial Magistrate Yashdeep Chahal, in an order dated September 13, acknowledged that the accused had cooperated with the investigation but emphasized that the LOC serves as a precautionary measure to ensure the judicial process is not undermined. The judge noted that requiring court permission for overseas travel would not guarantee compliance, as the accused could travel without such authorisation, leaving the court without any practical means to enforce the restriction. While personal liberty is important, reasonable restrictions can be imposed on the right to life and liberty under due legal procedures, the judge stated, concluding that there was insufficient reason to revoke the LOC. However, the judge stressed that authorities must inform individuals of the reasons for preventing their travel. It is the fundamental right of the accused to be aware of why their travel is being restricted, he remarked. Advocate Sanjay Abbot represented the homebuyers who lodged complaints against ATS Infrastructure. (ET)

Next Story
Real Estate

Delhi HC orders Ansal Properties to maintain status quo

The Delhi High Court issued a directive requiring Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. on Monday to maintain the status quo on all its unencumbered assets. The order was issued in response to a petition filed by Debenture Trustee Vistra ITCL, acting on behalf of the debenture holders. The petition sought to enforce an order from an Arbitral Tribunal, which required Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. to furnish security amounting to Rs 5.03 billion. The bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh stated that the judgment-debtor, Ansal Properties, and Infrastructure Ltd., must maintain the status q..

Next Story
Real Estate

MREAT sets aside MahaRERA order

A recent Maharashtra Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MREAT) judgment set aside a MahaRERA order and directed the ITMC developers, promoters of the Sai Sapphire project at Vikhroli, to pay interest on an amount of about Rs 94 lakh, paid by the home buyers towards part consideration of a flat. The interest has been charged at the rate of 2% above the SBI Highest MCLR from April 2019 till the time the actual possession with OC is handed over to home buyers. While setting aside the MahaRERA order passed by Vijay Satbir Singh in April 2022, the MREAT said that the order passed by the au..

Next Story
Real Estate

Institutional investment in real estate up 31% to $4.61 billion in Jan-Sept 2024

Institutional investments in the Indian real estate sector increased 31 %year-on-year to $ 4.61 billion in January-September 2024 amid strong consumer demand, according to Vestian. Real estate consultant Vestian released its report on 'Investment in Indian Real Estate', observing that funds' inflow from institutional investors in the first nine months of 2024 has already surpassed the total for 2023. "Investors have shown confidence in India's growth story on the back of robust GDP growth. As a result, the real estate sector witnessed increased participation from foreign investors which led to..

Hi There!

"Now get regular updates from CW Magazine on WhatsApp!

Join the CW WhatsApp channel for the latest news, industry events, expert insights, and project updates from the construction and infrastructure industry.

Click the link below to join"

+91 81086 03000