SC strikes down WB’s HIRA law on real estate regulations
Real Estate

SC strikes down WB’s HIRA law on real estate regulations

The Supreme Court (SC) struck out West Bengal's law on regulating the real estate sector, stating it as unconstitutional as the State's statute encroached upon the Centre's Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).

The apex court noted that the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulatory Authority (WB HIRA) has failed to include valuable safeguards for the homebuyers. A bench of justices—DY Chandrachud and MR Shah—said the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act (HIRA), 2017 is somewhat identical to the centre's RERA repugnant to Parliament's law.

The judgement came on a plea of 'Forum For People's Collective Efforts', an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is more or less identical to the Centre's RERA.

Pronouncing the verdict through video conferencing, Justice Chandrachud said that fundamental features of the WB HIRA overlap and is a word-to-word duplication of the centre's RERA.

The bench, which passed a lengthy verdict on the issue, said that West Bengal’s HIRA touches upon entry six and seven of the concurrent list, which was occupied by the law passed by Parliament and set up a parallel regime in the State.

The panel said that WB HIRA is directly in conflict with RERA, without any valuable safeguards for the home buyers, and that it is invoking powers under Article 142 to hold that registrations of properties done under the state law before its verdict will be valid.

During the hearing of the petition, the top court wondered whether a state, in the name of cooperative federalism, enact legislation under the concurrent list to occupy the same subjects in which Parliament has enacted a law.

The court observed that both centre's RERA and WB HIRA dealt with issues of providing reliefs to home buyers and promoting real estate sectors, but some of the provisions of the state's legislation were in direct conflict with the law passed by the Parliament.

It had wondered why a state would have a similar law enacted when there is already a law passed by Parliament and said many provisions in WB HIRA are similar to the central government's RERA.

Image Source


Also read: Impacts of interpretations on RERA: A legal analysis

The Supreme Court (SC) struck out West Bengal's law on regulating the real estate sector, stating it as unconstitutional as the State's statute encroached upon the Centre's Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). The apex court noted that the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulatory Authority (WB HIRA) has failed to include valuable safeguards for the homebuyers. A bench of justices—DY Chandrachud and MR Shah—said the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act (HIRA), 2017 is somewhat identical to the centre's RERA repugnant to Parliament's law. The judgement came on a plea of 'Forum For People's Collective Efforts', an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is more or less identical to the Centre's RERA. Pronouncing the verdict through video conferencing, Justice Chandrachud said that fundamental features of the WB HIRA overlap and is a word-to-word duplication of the centre's RERA. The bench, which passed a lengthy verdict on the issue, said that West Bengal’s HIRA touches upon entry six and seven of the concurrent list, which was occupied by the law passed by Parliament and set up a parallel regime in the State. The panel said that WB HIRA is directly in conflict with RERA, without any valuable safeguards for the home buyers, and that it is invoking powers under Article 142 to hold that registrations of properties done under the state law before its verdict will be valid. During the hearing of the petition, the top court wondered whether a state, in the name of cooperative federalism, enact legislation under the concurrent list to occupy the same subjects in which Parliament has enacted a law. The court observed that both centre's RERA and WB HIRA dealt with issues of providing reliefs to home buyers and promoting real estate sectors, but some of the provisions of the state's legislation were in direct conflict with the law passed by the Parliament. It had wondered why a state would have a similar law enacted when there is already a law passed by Parliament and said many provisions in WB HIRA are similar to the central government's RERA. Image Source Also read: Impacts of interpretations on RERA: A legal analysis

Next Story
Products

Viva ACP Launches FR A1-Rated Honeycomb Panels for Fire Safety

Viva, Asia’s largest manufacturer and supplier of aluminium composite panels (ACP) introduced its FR A1-rated Honeycomb Panels, setting a new industry benchmark for fire safety and architectural excellence. Engineered to deliver exceptional performance, these panels combine advanced fire-resistance technology with aesthetic versatility, offering a revolutionary solution for safety-critical environments.The FR A1 rating represents the highest standard of fire resistance under the European Standard EN 13501-1, signifying non-combustibility and zero contribution to fire, smoke, or toxic emissio..

Next Story
Real Estate

Almal Real Estate Expands into Commercial, Global Markets

Almal Real Estate Development is soon to announce its upcoming expansion into new verticals and international markets as part of its strategic growth plans for 2030. The company, known for its innovative luxury residential and hospitality developments, is preparing to diversify into the commercial sector with the introduction of The Smart Space, a network of business centers in UAE featuring five-star amenities. Additionally, Almal is entering new markets in Bali and Thailand as a community developer, focusing on villa and townhouse projects.The expansion into the commercial real estate sector..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

NABARD Approves Rs 9.03 Billion for 127 Projects in Himachal

The Himachal Pradesh government has secured approval from the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) for 127 projects worth Rs 9.03 billion for the 2024-25 fiscal, Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu announced. During a meeting with MLAs from Kangra, Kullu, Kinnaur, Solan, Chamba, Bilaspur, and Lahaul-Spiti districts to discuss priorities for the 2025-26 budget, Sukhu said the approved projects include 50 MLA-priority schemes under the Public Works Department, valued at Rs 4.12 billion, and 23 MLA-priority schemes under the Jal Shakti Vibhag, costing Rs 1.79 billio..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?