K-RERA Fails to Recover Rs 486 Crore Penalties
Real Estate

K-RERA Fails to Recover Rs 486 Crore Penalties

The Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-RERA) has yet to recover a staggering sum of Rs 4.86 billion in penalties from builders who violated its orders, leaving numerous complaints unresolved. Despite its establishment seven years ago, the authority faces challenges in enforcing penalties, leading to frustrations among homebuyers.

Since its inception, K-RERA has imposed penalties in 1,248 cases, totaling Rs 547.31 crore. However, only a fraction of this amount, Rs 606.4 billion, has been collected from 138 cases. The remaining more than Rs 4.86 billion remains outstanding in 1,110 pending cases, prolonging the ordeal for affected parties.

Many homebuyers express dismay over the slow progress in recovering penalties. "Builders make lofty promises but fail to deliver. When we seek recourse through K-RERA, we're met with delays and inaction," lamented a citizen burdened by loans and unfulfilled promises.

Despite K-RERA's orders issued years ago, little progress has been made in many cases, with builders failing to refund aggrieved buyers. Legal complexities further impede resolution, with builders obtaining stay orders from various courts. For instance, a prominent builder faces a Rs 90 crore repayment obligation, contesting K-RERA's directive in court, prolonging the legal battle.

The Real Estate Regulation and Development (RERA) Act of 2016 aimed to overhaul India's real estate sector, fostering transparency and accountability. However, the challenges faced by K-RERA underscore the persistent hurdles in achieving these objectives.

While K-RERA brought hope to many defrauded homebuyers, its efficacy remains a subject of debate. As India's real estate sector continues to expand, addressing these challenges becomes imperative to safeguard the interests of investors and homeowners alike.

The Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (K-RERA) has yet to recover a staggering sum of Rs 4.86 billion in penalties from builders who violated its orders, leaving numerous complaints unresolved. Despite its establishment seven years ago, the authority faces challenges in enforcing penalties, leading to frustrations among homebuyers. Since its inception, K-RERA has imposed penalties in 1,248 cases, totaling Rs 547.31 crore. However, only a fraction of this amount, Rs 606.4 billion, has been collected from 138 cases. The remaining more than Rs 4.86 billion remains outstanding in 1,110 pending cases, prolonging the ordeal for affected parties. Many homebuyers express dismay over the slow progress in recovering penalties. Builders make lofty promises but fail to deliver. When we seek recourse through K-RERA, we're met with delays and inaction, lamented a citizen burdened by loans and unfulfilled promises. Despite K-RERA's orders issued years ago, little progress has been made in many cases, with builders failing to refund aggrieved buyers. Legal complexities further impede resolution, with builders obtaining stay orders from various courts. For instance, a prominent builder faces a Rs 90 crore repayment obligation, contesting K-RERA's directive in court, prolonging the legal battle. The Real Estate Regulation and Development (RERA) Act of 2016 aimed to overhaul India's real estate sector, fostering transparency and accountability. However, the challenges faced by K-RERA underscore the persistent hurdles in achieving these objectives. While K-RERA brought hope to many defrauded homebuyers, its efficacy remains a subject of debate. As India's real estate sector continues to expand, addressing these challenges becomes imperative to safeguard the interests of investors and homeowners alike.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

SC ruling empowers MSME promoters to submit resolution plans under IBC

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has clarified the applicability of Sections 29A and 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), providing a significant boost to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) facing insolvency.The Court ruled that the eligibility for MSME promoters to submit resolution plans under Section 240A should be determined by the date of submission of the resolution plan, rather than the commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). This decision overturns a previous ruling by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

TNPDC hesitant to install prepaid meters

While the Tamil Nadu Power Distribution Company (TNPDC) remains hesitant to implement prepaid smart meters, many consumers have expressed support for the idea. The Union Power Ministry has recommended TNPDC consider adopting prepaid meters to offer consumers greater flexibility and convenience.In a recent meeting, Union Minister for Power and Urban Affairs, Manohar Lal, urged TNPDC officials to explore both prepaid and postpaid options, suggesting special benefits for those who opt for prepaid meters. Tamil Nadu’s Electricity Minister, V. Senthil Balaji, highlighted the state's current posit..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Sonowal inaugurates key infra projects at Chennai and Kamarajar ports

"Union Minister for Ports, Shipping & Waterways, Sarbananda Sonowal, inaugurated infrastructure projects worth ₹187.33 crore to strengthen operations at Chennai and Kamarajar Ports, enhancing India's maritime infrastructure and green port initiatives.The key projects include:EXIM Godowns at Chennai Port: Four newly constructed godowns, covering 18,000 square meters at a cost of ₹73.91 crore, will provide storage for sensitive cargo, such as agricultural products and food grains. This project, funded under the Sagarmala scheme, supports India’s goal of expanding trade capacity at ma..

Hi There!

"Now get regular updates from CW Magazine on WhatsApp!

Join the CW WhatsApp channel for the latest news, industry events, expert insights, and project updates from the construction and infrastructure industry.

Click the link below to join"

+91 81086 03000