Bombay HC Denies Slum Transit Rent Plea
Real Estate

Bombay HC Denies Slum Transit Rent Plea

The Bombay High Court recently declined to grant relief in a plea seeking a transit rent of Rs 15 crore for slums affected by a rehabilitation project. The court's decision comes as a setback to the slum dwellers who were hoping for compensation during the period of transition.

The plea was filed by slum residents who were displaced due to a redevelopment project in the city. The residents had sought the payment of transit rent to cover their accommodation expenses during the process. However, the court rejected their request, stating that there was no provision for transit rent under the Maharashtra Slum Rehabilitation Act.

The court noted that the act only provided for the rehabilitation of slum dwellers and did not include provisions for transit rent or compensation. It added that the government could make appropriate amendments to the act if deemed necessary.

The slum dwellers argued that the payment of transit rent was essential to tide them over the period of dislocation and enable them to find suitable accommodation elsewhere. They pointed out that their displacement had left them in a vulnerable position and that the lack of compensation would further exacerbate their already dire living conditions.

Despite their arguments, the court held that it was not within its purview to create a provision for transit rent where none existed. It cited the absence of such provisions in the law and urged the slum dwellers to approach the government or appropriate authorities for any changes in legislation.

The decision has led to disappointment and frustration among the affected slum dwellers. Many argue that without transit rent, their chances of finding alternative accommodation that is affordable and within their means are slim. They feel let down by the lack of support and compensation from the government during their displacement process.

This case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by slum dwellers during redevelopment projects. While the aim of these projects is to improve living conditions and provide better infrastructure, there is a need for a comprehensive approach that takes into account the concerns of the affected communities. Adequate compensation and support for transitional periods have become increasingly important to ensure a fair and just process for all involved.

Overall, the Bombay High Court's decision to deny relief in the form of transit rent to slum dwellers affected by a rehabilitation project emphasizes the need for policy changes to address the concerns of vulnerable communities during such transitions.

The Bombay High Court recently declined to grant relief in a plea seeking a transit rent of Rs 15 crore for slums affected by a rehabilitation project. The court's decision comes as a setback to the slum dwellers who were hoping for compensation during the period of transition. The plea was filed by slum residents who were displaced due to a redevelopment project in the city. The residents had sought the payment of transit rent to cover their accommodation expenses during the process. However, the court rejected their request, stating that there was no provision for transit rent under the Maharashtra Slum Rehabilitation Act. The court noted that the act only provided for the rehabilitation of slum dwellers and did not include provisions for transit rent or compensation. It added that the government could make appropriate amendments to the act if deemed necessary. The slum dwellers argued that the payment of transit rent was essential to tide them over the period of dislocation and enable them to find suitable accommodation elsewhere. They pointed out that their displacement had left them in a vulnerable position and that the lack of compensation would further exacerbate their already dire living conditions. Despite their arguments, the court held that it was not within its purview to create a provision for transit rent where none existed. It cited the absence of such provisions in the law and urged the slum dwellers to approach the government or appropriate authorities for any changes in legislation. The decision has led to disappointment and frustration among the affected slum dwellers. Many argue that without transit rent, their chances of finding alternative accommodation that is affordable and within their means are slim. They feel let down by the lack of support and compensation from the government during their displacement process. This case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by slum dwellers during redevelopment projects. While the aim of these projects is to improve living conditions and provide better infrastructure, there is a need for a comprehensive approach that takes into account the concerns of the affected communities. Adequate compensation and support for transitional periods have become increasingly important to ensure a fair and just process for all involved. Overall, the Bombay High Court's decision to deny relief in the form of transit rent to slum dwellers affected by a rehabilitation project emphasizes the need for policy changes to address the concerns of vulnerable communities during such transitions.

Next Story
Building Material

Ambuja Cements Drags JSW Cement to Court Over ‘Kawach’ Brand

Ambuja Cements, part of the Adani Group, has filed a trademark infringement case against JSW Cement in the Delhi High Court, alleging that its rival copied the ‘Kawach’ brand with its new product ‘Jal Kavach’.Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora issued summons to JSW Cement and its subsidiary, JSW IP Holdings Pvt Ltd, while referring the matter to mediation. Hearings are scheduled to resume on October 15 if no settlement is reached.Ambuja, which registered the ‘Kawach’ trademark in 2019, argues that the term ‘Kavach’—meaning shield—is the distinctive feature of its branding. ..

Next Story
Technology

Bentley Systems Named Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 by Afcons

Bentley Systems, the infrastructure engineering software company, has been recognised by Afcons Infrastructure Limited as its Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 at the Innovation Partners 2025 Felicitation Ceremony in Mumbai. The award acknowledges Bentley’s contribution to Afcons’ engineering digitalisation journey through an enterprise agreement providing access to over 250 Bentley engineering software tools. This adoption has enabled Afcons to accelerate project delivery, standardise digital workflows, and strengthen innovation across its infrastructure portfolio. Among key i..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

SBI Sells 13.18% Stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s SMBC

State Bank of India (SBI) has completed the sale of a 13.18 per cent stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) for over Rs 8,889 crore. The divestment is part of a Rs 13,482 crore deal finalised in May with SMBC and seven private banks.Following the transaction, SBI’s shareholding in Yes Bank stands at 10.8 per cent. The deal, involving 4,134.4 million shares at Rs 21.50 each, is the largest cross-border transaction in the Indian banking sector.SBI Chairman C S Setty described the 2020 RBI-led rescue of Yes Bank as a pioneering public-private partnership, addi..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?