Status Quo for GST on real estate maintained
Real Estate

Status Quo for GST on real estate maintained

  • Benefits aside, a cut could have been a major setback to the affordable housing segment

  • GST rate cut, clarity on or abolition of ITC – boosted demand vs actual sales

After much anticipation, the GST Council has failed to deliver a final verdict on GST applicable on real estate – but how much would it really have mattered?

Here’s a Utopian vision – the government would announce a GST rate cut, homebuyers would cheer up since prices would reduce marginally, and the market revives. Really?

The biggest paradox in Indian real estate is that numbers suggest a massive burden of unsold housing stock in the midst of a chronic shortage of housing. As long as prices don’t reduce significantly, the housing shortage will only widen regardless of tax sops.

What we have today is a nation of aspiring homebuyers, many of which are perpetually on the fence, waiting for a slew of minor policy windfalls to cumulatively make a home purchase feasible and attractive.

Most cities saw some sales growth in 2018, but the market cannot revive on consistently slow growth – it needs a decisive accelerator. Would a GST rate cut have been such an accelerator, or does the market need a lot more than that?

Certainly, GST on under-construction properties was a severe hurdle in 2018, and the possibility of a possible GST rate cut in late December literally froze property buying decisions for many. Regardless of how much or how little such a rate cut will actually do to revive the market, all stakeholders – from industry players to buyers – hoped for it with bated breath.

It bears remembering that the modest growth numbers we witnessed last year were significantly led by sales of ready-to-move properties – not only because they are exempt from GST, but because incessant project delays have taught buyers to be wary of under-construction projects.

High GST rates continue to burden commercial realty

While the major focus of anticipation for a GST rate change was on the residential sector, commercial real estate cannot be ignored. As of now, GST on commercial real estate continues to be levied at 18 per cent on the overall rental value without the builder getting any input credit benefits.

In the absence of input tax credit (ITC), developers invariably pass on the additional construction cost to their tenant businesses by way of increased rentals, over and above the charges that the latter pays as GST on the rental value.

This spikes up the overall rental cost for corporates leasing spaces across the country. Given that Indian commercial real estate kept the sectors growth numbers ticking during the prolonged slump, it was largely anticipated that to boost its growth further, the government would have given ITC benefits along with a possible rate cut.

However, back to residential. Let’s examine the actual savings that a possible GST rate cut would have actually implied for those who decided on under-construction residential properties.

Flat rate minus ITC benefits only some buyers

Replacing GST with the erstwhile service tax already caused considerable financial damage to serious buyers as they were taxed at 12 per cent as opposed to the more moderate twin taxes (service tax and VAT) earlier. Despite a provision for receiving ITC on GST, buyers never really had a clear understanding about how and when it would be credited.

Though the government directed builders pass on the ITC benefit to buyers – especially in the case of affordable homes – the ambiguity around the intent and delivery of this benefit prevails to the present day. This clearly indicates that a decision favouring a flat GST rate without ITC to benefit buyers makes a lot more sense.

A closer look:

Apartment Size (Sf)

1,000

Cost (Rs./Sf)

5,000

Total Cost (Rs.)

5,000,000

GST to be paid by Buyer @ 12%

600,000

 

 

Construction cost (Rs./Sf)

2,000

Material cost (Rs./Sf)

1,200

Cost of Material per Units (Rs.)

1,200,000

 

 

GST on Construction

5% - 28%

Average GST for consideration

15%

GST on cost of Material @ 18% (Rs.)

180,000

 

 

ITC to be received (Rs.)

180,000

 

 

 

When we talk of uncertainty of the ITC benefit, we are talking about uncertainty over an amount of Rs 180,000 on a product value of Rs 5,000,000 – approximately 3.6 per cent. This is doubtlessly a significant amount for most Indian homebuyers. Unfortunately, buyers were – and remain – oblivious to the fact that they are eligible to this benefit if builders passed it on to them.

Clearly, a flat 5 per cent rate of GST on under-construction homes without the ITC would provide an indubitable and transparent benefit to buyers. The only feasible scenarios are:

  1. A convincing and strongly-enforced clarifications on the ITC, and

  2. Its total abolishment in case of under-construction residential real estate.

Either of these two options would be added incentives to buy under-construction properties.

The other alternative was to fix the GST rate with ITC at 12 per cent of the cost of the property (effectively lowering GST to 8 per cent once the input cost is accounted for and reduced). Buyers would benefit from a lower tax, but be no wiser about what exactly they are entitled to under ITC – and how they will get it.

Lower GST would pinch budget home buyers

The popular assumption was that a flat GST rate cut would have boosted the entire residential sector. However, there was a high possibility that it could deliver a major setback to the affordable housing segment. In fact, lower GST rates minus ITC could increase the prices of budget homes. Currently, affordable homes are taxed at 8 per cent of the total cost, including the nebulous benefit of ITC.

A closer look at how costs could have varied post the new rate:

Cost of property (Rs./Sf)

3,000

Current GST @ 8%

240

Total cost for a buyer including GST

3,240

 

Cost of property (Rs./Sf)

3,000

New GST @ 5%

150

Input cost @ 15% of 1,800 (material + labour + consulting fee)

270

Total cost for a buyer including GST & Input cost

3,420

Thus, prices under the new flat GST rate of 5 per cent would have increased by Rs 180/- per sq ft for lower budget homes.

Demand vs sales

In 2018, there was a perceptible increase in site visits and buyers actively scouting for options at the best deal. Negotiations were getting increasingly interesting and meticulous as the parties debated out the costs and discounts to arrive at mutually acceptable figures. A final decision on the GST rate and clarity or the abolition of the ITC could have triggered demand, but would it really have helped close transactions?

Thus, we may need to look beyond minimal tax sops and consider whether they actually make homes affordable and catalyse sales. Perhaps, instead of constantly looking for tax sops, we need to question the very fundamental of pricing in real estate.

About the Author:
Anuj Puri is Chairman at Anarock Property Consultants.

 

Redefine the future of urban mobility! Join us at the Metro Rail Conference 2025 to explore groundbreaking ideas and insights. 👉 Register today!

Benefits aside, a cut could have been a major setback to the affordable housing segment GST rate cut, clarity on or abolition of ITC – boosted demand vs actual sales After much anticipation, the GST Council has failed to deliver a final verdict on GST applicable on real estate – but how much would it really have mattered? Here’s a Utopian vision – the government would announce a GST rate cut, homebuyers would cheer up since prices would reduce marginally, and the market revives. Really? The biggest paradox in Indian real estate is that numbers suggest a massive burden of unsold housing stock in the midst of a chronic shortage of housing. As long as prices don’t reduce significantly, the housing shortage will only widen regardless of tax sops. What we have today is a nation of aspiring homebuyers, many of which are perpetually on the fence, waiting for a slew of minor policy windfalls to cumulatively make a home purchase feasible and attractive. Most cities saw some sales growth in 2018, but the market cannot revive on consistently slow growth – it needs a decisive accelerator. Would a GST rate cut have been such an accelerator, or does the market need a lot more than that? Certainly, GST on under-construction properties was a severe hurdle in 2018, and the possibility of a possible GST rate cut in late December literally froze property buying decisions for many. Regardless of how much or how little such a rate cut will actually do to revive the market, all stakeholders – from industry players to buyers – hoped for it with bated breath. It bears remembering that the modest growth numbers we witnessed last year were significantly led by sales of ready-to-move properties – not only because they are exempt from GST, but because incessant project delays have taught buyers to be wary of under-construction projects. High GST rates continue to burden commercial realty While the major focus of anticipation for a GST rate change was on the residential sector, commercial real estate cannot be ignored. As of now, GST on commercial real estate continues to be levied at 18 per cent on the overall rental value without the builder getting any input credit benefits. In the absence of input tax credit (ITC), developers invariably pass on the additional construction cost to their tenant businesses by way of increased rentals, over and above the charges that the latter pays as GST on the rental value. This spikes up the overall rental cost for corporates leasing spaces across the country. Given that Indian commercial real estate kept the sectors growth numbers ticking during the prolonged slump, it was largely anticipated that to boost its growth further, the government would have given ITC benefits along with a possible rate cut. However, back to residential. Let’s examine the actual savings that a possible GST rate cut would have actually implied for those who decided on under-construction residential properties. Flat rate minus ITC benefits only some buyers Replacing GST with the erstwhile service tax already caused considerable financial damage to serious buyers as they were taxed at 12 per cent as opposed to the more moderate twin taxes (service tax and VAT) earlier. Despite a provision for receiving ITC on GST, buyers never really had a clear understanding about how and when it would be credited. Though the government directed builders pass on the ITC benefit to buyers – especially in the case of affordable homes – the ambiguity around the intent and delivery of this benefit prevails to the present day. This clearly indicates that a decision favouring a flat GST rate without ITC to benefit buyers makes a lot more sense. A closer look: Apartment Size (Sf) 1,000 Cost (Rs./Sf) 5,000 Total Cost (Rs.) 5,000,000 GST to be paid by Buyer @ 12% 600,000     Construction cost (Rs./Sf) 2,000 Material cost (Rs./Sf) 1,200 Cost of Material per Units (Rs.) 1,200,000     GST on Construction 5% - 28% Average GST for consideration 15% GST on cost of Material @ 18% (Rs.) 180,000     ITC to be received (Rs.) 180,000       When we talk of uncertainty of the ITC benefit, we are talking about uncertainty over an amount of Rs 180,000 on a product value of Rs 5,000,000 – approximately 3.6 per cent. This is doubtlessly a significant amount for most Indian homebuyers. Unfortunately, buyers were – and remain – oblivious to the fact that they are eligible to this benefit if builders passed it on to them. Clearly, a flat 5 per cent rate of GST on under-construction homes without the ITC would provide an indubitable and transparent benefit to buyers. The only feasible scenarios are: A convincing and strongly-enforced clarifications on the ITC, and Its total abolishment in case of under-construction residential real estate. Either of these two options would be added incentives to buy under-construction properties. The other alternative was to fix the GST rate with ITC at 12 per cent of the cost of the property (effectively lowering GST to 8 per cent once the input cost is accounted for and reduced). Buyers would benefit from a lower tax, but be no wiser about what exactly they are entitled to under ITC – and how they will get it. Lower GST would pinch budget home buyers The popular assumption was that a flat GST rate cut would have boosted the entire residential sector. However, there was a high possibility that it could deliver a major setback to the affordable housing segment. In fact, lower GST rates minus ITC could increase the prices of budget homes. Currently, affordable homes are taxed at 8 per cent of the total cost, including the nebulous benefit of ITC. A closer look at how costs could have varied post the new rate: Cost of property (Rs./Sf) 3,000 Current GST @ 8% 240 Total cost for a buyer including GST 3,240   Cost of property (Rs./Sf) 3,000 New GST @ 5% 150 Input cost @ 15% of 1,800 (material + labour + consulting fee) 270 Total cost for a buyer including GST & Input cost 3,420 Thus, prices under the new flat GST rate of 5 per cent would have increased by Rs 180/- per sq ft for lower budget homes. Demand vs sales In 2018, there was a perceptible increase in site visits and buyers actively scouting for options at the best deal. Negotiations were getting increasingly interesting and meticulous as the parties debated out the costs and discounts to arrive at mutually acceptable figures. A final decision on the GST rate and clarity or the abolition of the ITC could have triggered demand, but would it really have helped close transactions? Thus, we may need to look beyond minimal tax sops and consider whether they actually make homes affordable and catalyse sales. Perhaps, instead of constantly looking for tax sops, we need to question the very fundamental of pricing in real estate. About the Author: Anuj Puri is Chairman at Anarock Property Consultants.  

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Osaka Expo 2025 to Feature World’s Largest Wooden Structure

Osaka Expo 2025 will showcase the world’s largest wooden structure—a spectacular canopy encircling the 155-hectare exhibition grounds. Designed by architect Sou Fujimoto, the structure combines cutting-edge technology with Japan’s thousand-year tradition of wooden construction to create a futuristic yet sustainable landmark.“This is the biggest wooden construction in the world, so we used the latest technology alongside Japan's ancient craftsmanship to achieve a futuristic design,” Mr Fujimoto said. Rigorous testing ensured the strength of the beams and joints for the immense structu..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

India ranks 6th globally with 127 Net-zero firms

India has secured the sixth position globally in corporate climate action, with 127 companies committing to net-zero targets under the Science- Based Targets initiative (SBTi), according to the latest report from ICRA ESG Ratings.Although India contributes approximately 7 per cent of global emissions, its corporate commitments reflect a growing awareness of climate concerns. However, high-emission sectors such as power, energy, and cement are lagging in adopting these goals.The report reveals that fewer than 10 per cent of firms in these high-emission sectors, which contribute to 55 per cent o..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Power prices fall 31% amid renewable push

The average price of electricity traded on India’s power exchanges during October-November 2024 fell by 31 per cent year-on-year (YoY) to Rs.3.61 per unit in the Day-Ahead Market (DAM), down from Rs.5.23 per unit in the same period last year. Similarly, Real-Time Market (RTM) prices dropped by 29 per cent to Rs.3.59 per unit, compared to Rs.5.04 per unit a year ago, as per industry data. The price drop was driven by a surge in renewable energy generation, particularly hydro and wind power, supported by favourable monsoon conditions. Improved fuel availability and government-led ini..

Hi There!

"Now get regular updates from CW Magazine on WhatsApp!

Join the CW WhatsApp channel for the latest news, industry events, expert insights, and project updates from the construction and infrastructure industry.

Click the link below to join"

+91 81086 03000