WTO Forms Panel to Address China-US Dispute on Clean Energy Subsidies
POWER & RENEWABLE ENERGY

WTO Forms Panel to Address China-US Dispute on Clean Energy Subsidies

The ongoing dispute between China and the US regarding the latter's clean energy subsidies under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has escalated into a formal process, as the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has established a panel to address the issue.

The WTO’s Dispute Resolution Body (DSB), agreeing to China's second request, will examine whether specific tax credits included in the IRA comply with the multilateral trading system's regulations. Eighteen nations, such as the European Union, Russia, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Australia, have reserved their rights to participate as third parties in the proceedings.

China contends that the IRA's subsidies for clean energy projects preferentially benefit US goods while discriminating against imports, which violates WTO regulations. Initially, the US had opposed the establishment of a dispute resolution panel, arguing that its actions under the IRA were essential for combating climate change. However, it has since expressed disappointment over China's decision to seek a panel for the second time.

When China made its first request, it stated that consultations with the US had not resolved the conflict. The IRA was described as potentially the largest subsidy measure ever enacted, with official estimates of its climate-related provisions at $393 billion, while other assessments suggested the total could exceed $1 trillion.

China acknowledged that while many of the IRA's subsidy provisions were problematic, its challenge at the WTO was specifically directed at those provisions that contravene WTO rules. These included subsidies contingent upon the preference for domestic goods over imports or that discriminate against goods from China.

The provisions in question consist of the Clean Vehicle Credit and various Renewable Energy Tax Credits, which encompass the Investment Tax Credit for Energy Property, Clean Electricity Investment Tax Credit, Production Tax Credit for Electricity from Renewables, and Clean Electricity Production Tax Credit.

China emphasized that it understands the importance of clean energy transition benefits for all members but asserted that this should not come at the expense of the fundamental principle of non-discrimination, which is vital to the multilateral trading system. It argued that increased protectionism is not a viable solution to the climate crisis.

In response, the US claimed that China's request to the DSB undermines global efforts to tackle the climate crisis and develop a resilient clean energy supply chain. The US characterised China’s complaint as a regrettable attempt to hinder progress on critical issues, reinforcing reliance on China's excess non-market capacity and harming the broader interests of all WTO members.

The two nations are currently engaged in a contentious trade battle over clean energy supremacy. Earlier this month, the US announced significant tariff increases on imports of solar cells, electric vehicles (EVs), batteries, and critical minerals sourced from China. This new tariff regime, which will take effect on September 27, 2024, will impose a 100% tariff on EVs manufactured in China, a 50% tariff on solar cells, and a 25% tariff on EV batteries, critical minerals, aluminum, and steel. Additionally, a 50% tariff has been proposed for polysilicon

The ongoing dispute between China and the US regarding the latter's clean energy subsidies under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has escalated into a formal process, as the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has established a panel to address the issue. The WTO’s Dispute Resolution Body (DSB), agreeing to China's second request, will examine whether specific tax credits included in the IRA comply with the multilateral trading system's regulations. Eighteen nations, such as the European Union, Russia, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Australia, have reserved their rights to participate as third parties in the proceedings. China contends that the IRA's subsidies for clean energy projects preferentially benefit US goods while discriminating against imports, which violates WTO regulations. Initially, the US had opposed the establishment of a dispute resolution panel, arguing that its actions under the IRA were essential for combating climate change. However, it has since expressed disappointment over China's decision to seek a panel for the second time. When China made its first request, it stated that consultations with the US had not resolved the conflict. The IRA was described as potentially the largest subsidy measure ever enacted, with official estimates of its climate-related provisions at $393 billion, while other assessments suggested the total could exceed $1 trillion. China acknowledged that while many of the IRA's subsidy provisions were problematic, its challenge at the WTO was specifically directed at those provisions that contravene WTO rules. These included subsidies contingent upon the preference for domestic goods over imports or that discriminate against goods from China. The provisions in question consist of the Clean Vehicle Credit and various Renewable Energy Tax Credits, which encompass the Investment Tax Credit for Energy Property, Clean Electricity Investment Tax Credit, Production Tax Credit for Electricity from Renewables, and Clean Electricity Production Tax Credit. China emphasized that it understands the importance of clean energy transition benefits for all members but asserted that this should not come at the expense of the fundamental principle of non-discrimination, which is vital to the multilateral trading system. It argued that increased protectionism is not a viable solution to the climate crisis. In response, the US claimed that China's request to the DSB undermines global efforts to tackle the climate crisis and develop a resilient clean energy supply chain. The US characterised China’s complaint as a regrettable attempt to hinder progress on critical issues, reinforcing reliance on China's excess non-market capacity and harming the broader interests of all WTO members. The two nations are currently engaged in a contentious trade battle over clean energy supremacy. Earlier this month, the US announced significant tariff increases on imports of solar cells, electric vehicles (EVs), batteries, and critical minerals sourced from China. This new tariff regime, which will take effect on September 27, 2024, will impose a 100% tariff on EVs manufactured in China, a 50% tariff on solar cells, and a 25% tariff on EV batteries, critical minerals, aluminum, and steel. Additionally, a 50% tariff has been proposed for polysilicon

Next Story
Technology

Atlas Copco Unveils Innovation Centre in Pune for Smart Manufacturing

Atlas Copco Tools has inaugurated its first Smart Factory Innovation Centre in India, a cutting-edge facility in Pune designed to showcase advanced technologies powering Smart Integrated Assembly ecosystems. The centre will serve as a hub for businesses across automotive, aerospace, electronics, heavy machinery, and manufacturing sectors to explore automation and smart manufacturing solutions for zero-defect production.The Innovation Centre offers hands-on demonstrations of the latest torquing and dispensing technologies, highlighting software-driven solutions that optimize efficiency, enhance..

Next Story
Resources

Elite Elevators Unveils India’s First Fully Customizable Home Elevator

Elite Elevators, a leader in the premium home lift segment, has launched Elite Elevators Bespoke—India’s first fully customizable luxury home elevator. The launch event, held at the company’s Chennai headquarters, showcased how the new offering redefines residential mobility by integrating state-of-the-art technology with personalized design.Speaking on the launch, Vimal Babu, Founder and CEO, Elite Elevators, said, “At Elite Elevators, our mission has always been to revolutionize home mobility with world-class innovations. Through its enhanced customizable features, our Bespoke elevat..

Next Story
Real Estate

Under-Construction Homes Now Costlier Than Ready-to-Move Properties

Under-construction (UC) homes are now more expensive than ready-to-move (RTM) properties across major Indian metros, according to the latest insights from Magicbricks.In Delhi, UC homes are priced at Rs 25,921 per sq. ft., surpassing RTM properties at Rs 18,698 per sq. ft. Similarly, in Gurugram, UC homes cost Rs 17,185 per sq. ft., compared to Rs 14,617 per sq. ft. for RTM properties.Mumbai, India’s costliest real estate market, has also seen a sharp rise, with UC home prices soaring 33.4 per cent Y-o-Y in Q1 2025 to Rs 32,371 per sq. ft., while RTM properties stand at Rs 28,935 per sq. ft...

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?