SC upholds AERA powers, setback for GMR and Adani Groups
POWER & RENEWABLE ENERGY

SC upholds AERA powers, setback for GMR and Adani Groups

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the authority of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) to set tariffs for non-aeronautical services such as ground handling and cargo handling, dealing a blow to the GMR and Adani Groups. This decision overturns a ruling by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and orders that the matter proceed for hearing on merit.

Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), led by GMR, and Mumbai International Airport Limited, under Adani Enterprises, challenged AERA’s tariff-setting authority for non-aeronautical services. They argued that AERA’s tariff determination is an adjudicatory function and raised doubts about its jurisdiction to regulate non-aeronautical services.

The Supreme Court rejected this argument, clarifying that even administrative actions, such as AERA’s tariff regulation, require adherence to principles of natural justice, without necessarily being adjudicatory. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra emphasised that AERA’s primary duty is to ensure economically viable airport operations without compromising public interest.

The court noted that AERA, acting as a regulator, must factor in multiple considerations to determine and amend tariffs as required in the public interest. It ruled that AERA is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders and must be included as a respondent in such cases before TDSAT.

The conflict arose from a 2021 AERA order, which classified ground and cargo handling services as non-aeronautical when directly provided by DIAL but as aeronautical when managed through contractors. DIAL contested this order before TDSAT, which ruled in January 2023 that both services are non-aeronautical regardless of the provider. TDSAT also held that AERA lacked the jurisdiction to regulate tariffs for these services, citing existing agreements under which airport operators could set charges for non-aeronautical services.

However, AERA argued that its 2008 Act empowers it to regulate these services, even though TDSAT ruled otherwise. With the Supreme Court’s latest decision, AERA’s regulatory authority is reaffirmed, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for India’s airports.

(Business Standard)

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the authority of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) to set tariffs for non-aeronautical services such as ground handling and cargo handling, dealing a blow to the GMR and Adani Groups. This decision overturns a ruling by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and orders that the matter proceed for hearing on merit. Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), led by GMR, and Mumbai International Airport Limited, under Adani Enterprises, challenged AERA’s tariff-setting authority for non-aeronautical services. They argued that AERA’s tariff determination is an adjudicatory function and raised doubts about its jurisdiction to regulate non-aeronautical services. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, clarifying that even administrative actions, such as AERA’s tariff regulation, require adherence to principles of natural justice, without necessarily being adjudicatory. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra emphasised that AERA’s primary duty is to ensure economically viable airport operations without compromising public interest. The court noted that AERA, acting as a regulator, must factor in multiple considerations to determine and amend tariffs as required in the public interest. It ruled that AERA is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders and must be included as a respondent in such cases before TDSAT. The conflict arose from a 2021 AERA order, which classified ground and cargo handling services as non-aeronautical when directly provided by DIAL but as aeronautical when managed through contractors. DIAL contested this order before TDSAT, which ruled in January 2023 that both services are non-aeronautical regardless of the provider. TDSAT also held that AERA lacked the jurisdiction to regulate tariffs for these services, citing existing agreements under which airport operators could set charges for non-aeronautical services. However, AERA argued that its 2008 Act empowers it to regulate these services, even though TDSAT ruled otherwise. With the Supreme Court’s latest decision, AERA’s regulatory authority is reaffirmed, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for India’s airports. (Business Standard)

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

FIMI seeks urgent RoDTEP extension for aluminium exporters

"The Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (FIMI) has urged the Ministry of Commerce and Industry to extend the Remission of Duties or Taxes on Export Products (RoDTEP) Scheme for aluminium-producing units operating under Advance Authorisation (AA), Export Oriented Units (EOUs), and Special Economic Zones (SEZs).This appeal follows a similar request made by the Aluminium Association of India (AAI) to the Ministry of Finance, citing the need to safeguard the competitiveness of nearly 45 per cent of India’s aluminium exports originating from AA/EOU/SEZ units.In a letter to Commerce Secretary..

Next Story
Real Estate

Mumbai logs over 12,000 property deals in April; revenue nears Rs 9.9 bn

Mumbai (BMC limits) is set to clock over 12,142 property registrations in April 2025, contributing more than Rs 9.9 billion in state revenue, according to Knight Frank India. This marks the city’s strongest April performance in 13 years, registering a 4 per cent year-on-year rise in volumes. However, stamp duty revenue dipped by 6 per cent during the same period.Residential transactions continue to dominate, accounting for 80 per cent of total registrations. Notably, premium housing gained momentum, with the share of properties priced above Rs 2 crore rising from 22 per cent to 25 per cent, ..

Next Story
Real Estate

MHADA to issue redevelopment NOCs within 6 weeks: Jaiswal

In a major boost to Mumbai’s redevelopment momentum, Mr. Sanjeev Jaiswal, IAS, Vice President and CEO of MHADA, announced that No Objection Certificates (NOCs) for the redevelopment of old cessed buildings submitted under Section 79A(1a) or 79A(1b), along with 51 per cent resident consent, will be issued within six weeks. The directive, declared at MHADA’s 2nd Redevelopment Conference and Investors Summit, brings these approvals under the Right to Service Act. If delayed beyond the stipulated timeframe, the NOC will be deemed approved.The event, held at MIG Club, Bandra (East), brought tog..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?