APTEL Reverses KSERC's Power Tariff Ruling
POWER & RENEWABLE ENERGY

APTEL Reverses KSERC's Power Tariff Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) recently overturned a Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission (KSERC) order, ruling that KSERC had overstepped its jurisdiction by intervening in a multi-state electricity dispute. The dispute centered around the generation and sale of solar power, which falls under the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's (CERC) authority.

The issue began when the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) issued a tender for 300 MW of solar power, structured under a Power Sale Agreement (PSA) with the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). 

The PSA, submitted for KSERC's approval, faced two significant alterations:

KSERC redefined “Appropriate Commission” to include both CERC and KSERC, potentially causing jurisdictional conflicts.

KSERC capped the tariff payable by KSEB at ₹2.44 (~$0.029)/kWh, even if CERC approved a higher rate for the solar power producer, ReNew Power.

SECI argued that the PSA and related agreements involved a composite scheme that required uniform regulation by CERC to avoid inconsistencies. KSERC defended its changes, citing its authority to regulate non-tariff aspects of the PSA under the Electricity Act 2003.

APTEL sided with SECI, ruling that KSERC's tariff cap and jurisdictional claims were inappropriate for inter-state transactions. The Tribunal emphasized that only CERC has the authority to regulate such matters, due to the interconnected nature of the agreements.

As a result, APTEL annulled KSERC’s modifications, reaffirming that CERC is the sole authority for all aspects of the PSA, including non-tariff disputes. This decision ensures consistency and prevents regulatory conflicts in multi-state electricity transactions.

Additionally, the Tribunal recently granted POWERGRID Southern Interconnector Transmission System a 289-day extension to complete a transmission project, acknowledging delays due to "force majeure" events.

The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) recently overturned a Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission (KSERC) order, ruling that KSERC had overstepped its jurisdiction by intervening in a multi-state electricity dispute. The dispute centered around the generation and sale of solar power, which falls under the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's (CERC) authority.The issue began when the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) issued a tender for 300 MW of solar power, structured under a Power Sale Agreement (PSA) with the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB). The PSA, submitted for KSERC's approval, faced two significant alterations:KSERC redefined “Appropriate Commission” to include both CERC and KSERC, potentially causing jurisdictional conflicts.KSERC capped the tariff payable by KSEB at ₹2.44 (~$0.029)/kWh, even if CERC approved a higher rate for the solar power producer, ReNew Power.SECI argued that the PSA and related agreements involved a composite scheme that required uniform regulation by CERC to avoid inconsistencies. KSERC defended its changes, citing its authority to regulate non-tariff aspects of the PSA under the Electricity Act 2003.APTEL sided with SECI, ruling that KSERC's tariff cap and jurisdictional claims were inappropriate for inter-state transactions. The Tribunal emphasized that only CERC has the authority to regulate such matters, due to the interconnected nature of the agreements.As a result, APTEL annulled KSERC’s modifications, reaffirming that CERC is the sole authority for all aspects of the PSA, including non-tariff disputes. This decision ensures consistency and prevents regulatory conflicts in multi-state electricity transactions.Additionally, the Tribunal recently granted POWERGRID Southern Interconnector Transmission System a 289-day extension to complete a transmission project, acknowledging delays due to force majeure events.

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?