Port delays and red tape strain India’s 10,000 steel user units
The think tank highlighted that policies aimed at protecting domestic steelmakers, such as import restrictions and quality control measures, have unintentionally hurt industries that rely on imported steel for manufacturing. These regulations, while beneficial to local producers, have caused severe delays in shipments and increased costs for companies using steel in their production processes.
In a statement, GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava emphasized that over 10,000 steel user units are currently facing severe financial strains, threatening their ability to remain operational and continue exporting goods. These industries, which play a critical role in India’s manufacturing sector, are finding it increasingly difficult to maintain supply chains due to the excessive scrutiny of imports.
One of the key factors contributing to these delays is the government’s Steel Import Monitoring System (SIMS), which requires detailed declarations of steel imports before they arrive in the country. However, the process has led to confusion, as customs officials have extended these requirements beyond the steel products subject to quality control orders (QCOs), demanding unnecessary No Objection Certificates (NOCs) from the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) for items that do not fall under these regulations. The delay in obtaining NOCs from BIS has led to longer clearance times at ports, further straining the steel user units.
Additionally, the Steel Ministry’s SIMS system, designed to monitor steel imports, has often malfunctioned, causing delays and complications in the clearance process. GTRI has urged the government to implement clearer, more efficient procedures for monitoring imports, as well as focusing on digitizing the clearance system to reduce bottlenecks.
The think tank also pointed out that Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) need to be carefully reviewed. Some FTAs have allowed foreign producers to re-import steel at concessional rates, raising concerns about the growing competition faced by domestic steelmakers. GTRI stressed that if import restrictions are necessary, they should be enforced through well-defined policies rather than through procedural roadblocks that disrupt the smooth functioning of the sector.
In conclusion, GTRI called for reforms in the steel import process, suggesting that the government must focus on developing a framework that supports both domestic steelmakers and industries dependent on steel imports. Without these improvements, the think tank warned, India’s broader manufacturing sector and its global manufacturing aspirations could face significant challenges.