The recent ruling is set to streamline transactions and potentially encourage increased investments in India’s industrial and commercial leasing sectors.

The judgment addressed whether transferring leasehold rights for Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) plots constitutes a ‘supply’ under the GST Act. The court determined that these transactions involve the transfer of immovable property rather than a service, thereby placing them outside the purview of GST.

This decision offers significant relief to industries such as manufacturing, logistics, and warehousing, where long-term leasehold rights are commonly assigned. The exemption from GST removes an added financial and compliance burden that previously complicated and increased the cost of such transactions.

Abhishek A Rastogi, founder of Rastogi Chambers, noted that the ruling highlights the necessity for the GST Council to issue explicit guidelines on taxation related to immovable property transactions. He emphasized that clear policy directions could help reduce litigation, improve compliance, and promote a uniform tax regime across states. Although tax authorities may face short-term revenue challenges, the ruling aligns with GST’s foundational principles. He also mentioned that an appeal to the Supreme Court is likely, potentially delaying broader policy reforms while reinforcing a favourable precedent for taxpayers.

Meanwhile, the Bombay High Court is expected to hear a similar case this week.

A real estate developer commented that the judgment provides greater clarity for structuring long-term lease agreements for industrial plots. It is anticipated to drive growth in the industrial leasing market, drawing both domestic and international investments in key zones such as special economic zones (SEZs) and government-supported industrial parks.

The Gujarat High Court ruling further clarifies GST’s application in the real estate sector by equating leasehold rights with the sale of land, which is explicitly excluded from GST under Schedule III of the GST Act. This legal interpretation strengthens the position that leasehold rights, as interests in immovable property, should not be subject to taxation upon transfer.

By addressing concerns over inconsistent tax treatment in real estate transactions, the judgment is expected to make the sector more attractive and conducive to investments, particularly benefiting the industrial leasing segment. The decision marks a pivotal shift for India’s real estate landscape.