The ruling clarifies the jurisdictional boundaries of RERA, which primarily governs matters related to real estate developers, builders, and agents involved in the sale and purchase of properties. In this case, the court determined that the service provider’s activities were not related to real estate transactions or development, and thus, the matter could not be adjudicated under RERA.

This judgment reinforces the importance of understanding the scope of RERA’s powers and ensures that complaints and petitions are filed under the correct legal framework. It also sets a precedent for similar cases where parties seek to invoke RERA against service providers who may not be directly involved in property transactions.

The court’s decision highlights the need for clarity and proper legal channels when addressing disputes in the real estate sector. It also emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the different categories of real estate-related services and adhering to the correct legal processes for dispute resolution.